Dubai, September 2025 – The Asia Cup, long considered one of cricket’s most passionate and politically charged tournaments, has once again found itself at the center of controversy. Following their high-voltage clash at the Dubai International Stadium, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has officially lodged a complaint with the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) after Indian players, led by stand-in captain Suryakumar Yadav, reportedly refused to engage in the traditional post-match handshake with their Pakistani counterparts.
What should have been remembered as a thrilling encounter between two cricketing heavyweights has now spiraled into a diplomatic row, bringing back old questions about the fragile relationship between India and Pakistan both on and off the field.
The Match That Sparked the Controversy
The much-anticipated Asia Cup group stage match between India and Pakistan drew a packed house in Dubai, with fans traveling from across the Gulf, South Asia, and beyond. Cricketing ties between the two nations are rare, restricted mainly to ICC and ACC tournaments due to political tensions. This scarcity only intensifies the hype, making each contest more than just a game—it becomes a battle for pride, honor, and national emotion.
The match itself was a spectacle. Pakistan, led by Babar Azam, put up a fighting total, while India, riding on Yadav’s aggressive batting and a late flourish from the middle order, managed to cross the finish line with a few overs to spare. The result gave India bragging rights in this leg of the tournament, but what happened immediately afterward overshadowed the cricketing display.
When the players lined up for customary handshakes, Indian players were seen walking straight past the Pakistani squad. While some offered curt nods from a distance, there was no collective exchange of handshakes—a ritual widely regarded as a hallmark of sportsmanship.
Pakistan’s Official Protest
The PCB wasted no time in raising the issue with the Asian Cricket Council. In its formal complaint, the board accused the Indian team of “unsportsmanlike conduct” and “deliberately snubbing a tradition that embodies respect between competitors.”
A PCB official, speaking to reporters on condition of anonymity, said:
“It is about the spirit of cricket. Rivalry is one thing, but disrespecting basic courtesy is another. We have written to the ACC, demanding they take note of this unsporting behavior.”
The letter reportedly calls for the ACC to remind all participating teams of their obligations to uphold cricketing etiquette, regardless of political tensions.
India’s Side of the Story
On the Indian side, no official statement has yet been issued by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), but team sources indicated that the decision not to engage in post-match handshakes was a “collective choice” taken in the dressing room.
Some Indian media outlets suggested that the refusal stemmed from lingering resentment over past incidents, including Pakistan’s fiery celebrations in previous encounters. Others pointed to the possibility of heightened security concerns, with the Indian contingent preferring to avoid direct interaction on the field.
Captain Suryakumar Yadav, when asked in the post-match press conference, deflected the question.
“We concentrated on playing cricket, which is why we came here. He stated bluntly that the players’ efforts on the field shouldn’t be overshadowed by what occurs after the game.
A History of Cricketing Flashpoints
This is not the first time India and Pakistan have clashed off the field as much as on it. Their cricketing rivalry is deeply intertwined with political history:
- 1999 World Cup: Tensions were sky-high due to the Kargil conflict. Players exchanged handshakes but avoided conversation.
- 2010 Asia Cup: A heated on-field altercation between Gautam Gambhir and Shahid Afridi symbolized the fierce rivalry.
- 2019 World Cup in England: Following the Pulwama attack, calls were made in India to boycott playing Pakistan altogether.
- 2023 Asia Cup: Pakistan objected to India’s refusal to travel to venues in Pakistan, leading to a hybrid hosting model.
The latest incident adds another chapter to this complex story, with symbolism often carrying as much weight as the cricket itself.
Fan Reactions: Outrage, Defensiveness, and Disappointment
Social media erupted within minutes of the handshake snub. Hashtags like #SpiritOfCricket and #HandshakeGate trended on both Indian and Pakistani Twitter (now X).
Pakistani fans accused India of arrogance, with some calling for sanctions.
“Win with dignity, lose with dignity—that’s what cricket teaches. India failed that today,” one Pakistani supporter wrote.
Indian fans, meanwhile, defended the team’s stance, arguing that political realities could not be divorced from sporting ties.
“Why should we expect our players to go through a forced ritual when relations are at their lowest? Respect has to be mutual,” an Indian user commented.
Neutral cricket fans expressed disappointment, lamenting that politics once again overshadowed the game.
Expert Opinions
Cricketing experts and former players weighed in, offering diverse perspectives.
Ramiz Raja, former PCB chairman and commentator, blasted India’s actions:
“This was petty. You can beat Pakistan on the field, but avoiding a handshake only diminishes your own victory.”
Sunil Gavaskar, Indian legend, was more cautious:
“Ideally, handshakes should happen. But we also need to respect the mental space of the players. This was not about cricketing skill—it was about deeper issues.”
Michael Vaughan, former England captain, called it “a sad day for cricket,” urging both boards to “remember that sport is meant to unite, not divide.”
The ACC’s Dilemma
The Asian Cricket Council now faces a delicate task. As the governing body responsible for organizing the Asia Cup, the ACC must balance fairness with political sensitivities. Punitive action against India—a powerhouse in cricket both financially and administratively—seems unlikely. However, the ACC is expected to issue a statement reminding all teams of the need to uphold the spirit of the game.
Cricket analysts suggest the most probable outcome will be a “formal warning” and a push to ensure such incidents do not repeat in upcoming fixtures.
Symbolism Beyond Cricket
What makes the controversy significant is that cricket between India and Pakistan is never just about bat and ball. Every gesture, every cheer, every snub carries political undertones.
The refusal to shake hands was not just a break from etiquette; it symbolized the lack of dialogue between the two nations at a broader level. With diplomatic channels largely frozen, cricket often serves as the only stage where interactions happen—and even here, courtesy has now become contested ground.
Some commentators argue that such incidents only deepen divisions, while others believe they reflect the unavoidable reality of India-Pakistan relations.
Looking Ahead
As the Asia Cup moves forward, attention will be on how both teams conduct themselves in future matches. The possibility of a semifinal or final clash looms large, raising questions about whether the handshake ritual will be repeated—or avoided again.
For now, the PCB’s protest ensures that the issue will not fade quickly. Discussions about sportsmanship, respect, and the role of politics in sport are likely to dominate cricketing discourse in the coming weeks.
The India-Pakistan rivalry remains cricket’s most electrifying theater, but also its most fragile. What should have been a celebration of cricketing excellence has instead turned into a storm over handshakes—a reminder that when these two nations meet, even the smallest gestures can carry the weight of history.
Whether the ACC intervenes meaningfully or lets the storm pass, the message is clear: Indo-Pak cricket will always be played on two pitches—the one at the center of the field, and the one shaped by politics, perceptions, and pride.
Related News: Read More
