In a significant environmental ruling, the Supreme Court of India on November 20, 2025, adopted a uniform definition for identifying the Aravalli Hills, setting a 100-meter height threshold as the key criterion for protection. The decision aligns with the definition proposed by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, stating that Aravalli hills are landforms rising at least 100 meters above the surrounding terrain.
The ruling aims to bring clarity to long-standing disputes over land classification, mining permissions, and conservation enforcement across Rajasthan, Haryana, and parts of Gujarat and Delhi. However, it has also triggered sharp reactions from opposition leaders and environmental activists, who fear that the decision could weaken protection for ecologically sensitive hillocks that fall below the new threshold.
Why the Aravalli Range Matters
The Aravalli range is one of the oldest mountain systems in the world and plays a crucial ecological role in northern India. Stretching across multiple states, the hills act as a natural barrier against desertification from the Thar Desert, help recharge groundwater, and significantly influence air quality in the National Capital Region, including Delhi.
Environmental experts have long argued that even smaller hillocks and rocky outcrops are essential for maintaining biodiversity, preventing soil erosion, and regulating local climate patterns. The concern now is that these smaller formations may lose legal protection under the new definition.
Environmentalists Warn of Risks to Smaller Hillocks
Following the verdict, environmental groups expressed apprehension that the 100-meter criterion could expose smaller hill formations to mining, construction, and deforestation. According to critics, these hillocks act as ecological connectors and buffers, and their degradation could worsen air pollution in Delhi and accelerate desert spread in adjoining regions.
Opposition leaders echoed these concerns, stating that the judgment, while legally precise, may overlook the ecological reality on the ground. They argue that environmental protection should be based not only on height but also on ecological function and regional impact.
Government Defends the Decision
The central government, however, has defended the Supreme Court’s adoption of a uniform definition. Officials emphasized that over 90% of the total Aravalli landscape around 1.44 lakh square kilometers will remain protected despite the new classification.
According to government sources, the ruling will reduce ambiguity and help authorities take consistent action against illegal mining and encroachment. The government has also clarified that no new mining leases will be issued in the Aravalli region until a comprehensive and sustainable mining framework is finalized.
Strict Oversight and Sustainable Planning Promised
To address environmental concerns, authorities have assured strict regulatory oversight in areas that fall outside the 100-meter definition. Existing environmental laws, forest regulations, and pollution control norms will continue to apply where relevant.
Officials also highlighted ongoing initiatives aimed at long-term conservation, including afforestation drives, land restoration projects, and community-based protection measures. The government maintains that the ruling does not dilute environmental safeguards but instead provides a clearer framework for sustainable development.
Aravalli Green Wall Project Gains Spotlight
One of the key conservation initiatives cited by the government is the Aravalli Green Wall Project, an ambitious plan to create a continuous green buffer along the Aravalli range. The project focuses on restoring degraded land through native plantations, improving biodiversity, and combating desertification.
The Green Wall initiative is also expected to play a role in improving air quality in Delhi and neighboring urban centers by acting as a natural pollution sink. Authorities argue that such projects demonstrate the government’s commitment to balancing development needs with environmental protection.
Legal Clarity vs Ecological Complexity
Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s decision brings much-needed clarity to a complex issue that has led to conflicting interpretations by state governments and regulatory bodies. In the past, varying definitions of the Aravalli hills resulted in uneven enforcement and prolonged litigation.
However, ecologists counter that ecological systems do not always conform to strict legal definitions. They argue that environmental governance must remain flexible enough to account for scientific evidence, especially in fragile ecosystems like the Aravallis.
What This Means for the Future
The ruling is likely to influence future environmental clearances, urban planning decisions, and mining policies across the Aravalli region. State governments may now revise land-use plans based on the 100-meter threshold, potentially reshaping development patterns.
At the same time, the judgment has intensified calls for stronger scientific input in policymaking, ensuring that conservation efforts protect not just prominent hills but also the lesser-known natural features that support the ecosystem.
A Balancing Act Ahead
As India grapples with the dual challenges of environmental degradation and economic growth, the Aravalli verdict underscores the delicate balance policymakers must strike. While the Supreme Court’s decision provides legal consistency, its real-world impact will depend on how effectively authorities enforce safeguards and invest in conservation.
The coming years will be crucial in determining whether the 100-meter rule strengthens environmental governance or becomes a point of contention in the ongoing battle to protect one of India’s most vital natural landscapes.
Related News: Iconic Statue of Liberty Replica Crashes to the Ground in Southern Brazil Amid High Winds
